Consider the problem of computing the exponential of a given number. We would like a function that takes as arguments a base and a positive integer exponent and computes . One way to do this is via the recursive definition

which translates readily into the function

(defun expt (b n)
  (if (== n 0)
      (* b (expt b (- n 1)))))

This is a linear recursive process, which requires steps and space. Just as with factorial, we can readily formulate an equivalent linear iteration:

(defun expt (b n)
  (expt b n 1))

(defun expt (b counter product)
  (if (== counter 0)
      (expt b
            (- counter 1)
            (* b product))))

This version requires steps and space.

We can compute exponentials in fewer steps by using successive squaring. For instance, rather than computing as

we can compute it using three multiplications:

This method works fine for exponents that are powers of 2. We can also take advantage of successive squaring in computing exponentials in general if we use the rule

We can express this method as a function:

(defun fast-expt (b n)
  (cond ((== n 0) 1)
        ((even? n) (square (fast-expt b (/ n 2))))
        ('true (* b (fast-expt b (- n 1))))))

where the predicate to test whether an integer is even is defined in terms of the primitive function rem by

(defun even? (n)
  (=:= 0 (rem (trunc n) 2)))

The process evolved by fast-expt grows logarithmically with in both space and number of steps. To see this, observe that computing using fast-expt requires only one more multiplication than computing . The size of the exponent we can compute therefore doubles (approximately) with every new multiplication we are allowed. Thus, the number of multiplications required for an exponent of n grows about as fast as the logarithm of to the base 2. The process has growth.1

The difference between growth and growth becomes striking as becomes large. For example, fast-expt for requires only 14 multiplications.2 It is also possible to use the idea of successive squaring to devise an iterative algorithm that computes exponentials with a logarithmic number of steps (see exercise 1.16), although, as is often the case with iterative algorithms, this is not written down so straightforwardly as the recursive algorithm.3

1. More precisely, the number of multiplications required is equal to 1 less than the log base 2 of plus the number of ones in the binary representation of . This total is always less than twice the log base 2 of . The arbitrary constants and in the definition of order notation imply that, for a logarithmic process, the base to which logarithms are taken does not matter, so all such processes are described as .
2. You may wonder why anyone would care about raising numbers to the 1000th power. See the section Example: Testing for Primality.
3. This iterative algorithm is ancient. It appears in the Chandah-sutra by Áchárya Pingala, written before 200 B.C. See Knuth 1981, section 4.6.3, for a full discussion and analysis of this and other methods of exponentiation.